|
CHARLIE
ROSE, Host: Welcome to the broadcast. Tonight, Israel's
ambassador to the United States, Itamar Rabinovich.
CHARLIE ROSE: Yesterday, the main assembly of the Palestine
Liberation Organization revoked a 32-year-old charter
calling for the destruction of the Jewish state. In
response, Israel's ruling Labor Party voted today to drop a
clause from their platform ruling out a Palestinian state.
The PLO vote keeps a promise made in the peace accord with
Israel and comes while fighting in southern Lebanon between
Hizballah and Israeli defense forces continues. Joining me
now from Washington, Israel's ambassador to the United
States, Itamar Rabinovich, who just returned from Israel, I
think yesterday. Mr. Ambassador, thank you for joining us.
ITAMAR RABINOVICH, Israeli Ambassador to the U.S.: Thank you
for having me, and good evening, Charlie.
CHARLIE ROSE: What do we expect next in the fighting between
Israel and Hizballah on- in Lebanon?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: What we would all like to see is an end
to that fighting. The Secretary of State has been in the
Middle East since last Saturday doing yeoman's work and
working even physically very hard to try to negotiate an end
to that. Tonight, late into Middle Eastern time, there was
still no resolution. The Secretary, around midnight Middle
Eastern time, was making his way from Damascus back to
Jerusalem, and we all hope that tomorrow, Friday, we'll
finally see an end to this.
CHARLIE ROSE: Why tomorrow, Friday?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: It cannot be done tonight. Right now is
very late at night in, in the Middle East. There is no
agreement yet, and hopefully, the elements of the deal that
I believe have been there for a few days now could be put
together and give us a deal that would mean a cease-fire, a
new set of understandings, and a period of calm and
stability along the Israeli-Lebanese border.
CHARLIE ROSE: You're a scholar of Syria, and you know Assad.
Could he stop this in a second?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: A second may be too dramatic, but he
could put an end to it. There are two elements in this
situation that can put an end to this, baring of cou- not
mentioning, of course, Hizballah itself. One is Iran, but
Iran is not interested. It actually pours motor oil onto the
fire. And Syria. Syria cannot issue direct instructions to
Hizballah because Hizballah takes direct orders from Iran.
But Syria holds sway in Lebanon. It has 40,000 troops in
Lebanon, and if Assad wants something either to happen or
not to happen in Lebanon, he can have his will happen.
CHARLIE ROSE: It's his sphere of influence. So why doesn't
he do it?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: That's- there is not a short and a simple
answer to, to this question. He, he is not a happy man. He,
he is not happy with the state of the peace process. He is
not happy with Hizballah's relationship with the United
States. He is not happy with the fact that others in the
region have been making progress in the peace, that Jordan
has peace with us, that the Israeli-Palestinian tract if
proceeding after all, that Prime Minister Peres was invited
to, to visit Oman [?] and Goddar [?] just a couple of weeks
ago, that we have relations with Morocco and Tunisia. He is
not happy with that, and where he can make that unhappiness
felt is mostly in Lebanon.
CHARLIE ROSE: What will it take to make him happy?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: I think a number of elements can make
that. There has to be a prospect of political settlement
involving Syria and Israel, and Lebanon and Israel. And this
is something that we are also interested in. There has to be
a fair deal for the present, which I believe is available;
and there has to be the exercising of American influence.
Assad is not only negotiating peace with us, he is also
negotiating a new type of relationship with the United
States. This is something-
CHARLIE ROSE: Has the United States offered, in your
judgment, a sufficient inducement to him to fill that
element of the equation?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: I think so. I think the fact that he has
met with American presidents, that President Clinton went to
Syria, all of this, you know, has happened already, and
there is the prospect of what may happen when there is peace
and stability in the region. You know Assad very much- or
Syria very much wants to get off the terrorist list. That is
something that Congress has to approve, and that is
something that can only happen when the original reasons the
put Syria on that list are removed. And this is something
that the Administration cannot make happen: This is
something that can only happen in a state of peace and when
all relationship between Syria and terrorist organizations
is brought to an end.
CHARLIE ROSE: So you don't want the United States Congress
to take that action until Syria has done- has, has what?
Eradicated itself as a home for terrorist organizations and
terrorist figures?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: There is, of course, the question of what
we want, but first and foremost, what the United States
itself wants, both Administration and Congress. And by the
way, not just the United States and Israel. There is also
Turkey, a very important state in the Middle East, that has
its own grievances about the Kurdish underground or
opposition organizations in, in Syria. And Turkey has also
raised its voice in that contest. It's a very complex issue
involving more than just us and Syria.
CHARLIE ROSE: What do you think the significance of the
Palestinian assembly voting to remove that aspect of the
covenant that's been central to any kind of peace between
Palestine and- the Palestinians and the, the Israeli
government?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: That's very significant in, in a number
of ways. First of, of all, it's a piece of very good news
that the period in which the, the peace process has not been
doing all that well, and it's a reminder to us that there is
a still process- there is still a peace process, and that
there is hope and prospect for that process. It indicated
that Arafat can live up to commitments and a very important
commitment. And from an Israeli point of view, the issue of
acceptance of Israel in the Arab world and acceptance by our
original adversary, the Palestinians, is very important so
that in terms of substance, the removal of these clauses is
very very significant.
CHARLIE ROSE: And so Rabin and Peres were right to bet on
Arafat because he has, at this point, delivered.
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: He has delivered on this, and while
underlining the significance of this, I also have to, to
mention that Assad- Arafat needs to continue to combat
terrorism on a day by day basis, that you do not resolve
these issues with one fell swoop or one dramatic act. But
the investment in, in peace and the preservation of peace
and security has to be done persistently over time.
CHARLIE ROSE: Are you convinced that he is doing that and
has done that since your government got rather tough with
him after the series of attacks by Hamas?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: He has been doing that in a very
different vein since the end of February, not just because
our government has become tough with him, but also because
the international community sent a very important signal,
and also because he realized that the challenge is not just
to us, but also to himself.
CHARLIE ROSE: In what way?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: Hamas is not just a political rival.
Hamas offers to the Palestinians an alternative. Hamas wants
to replace him, wants to undermine him and the route that he
has chosen. And the terrorist attacks, while they kill
Israelis, politically can destroy Arafat and the
administration that he has been building.
CHARLIE ROSE: What about the decision by the Labor
government, the Labor Party, to not- to drop a clause from
their campaign platform ruling out a Palestinian state? Or
said the other way, seeming just to say it's okay to have a
Palestinian state, reversing a long-standing principle by
the leadership of the Labor Party?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: What the Labor Party has been saying is
that this now becomes a legitimate option. It, it does not
say that this is something inevitable. We will begin on May
4th a period of negotiations with the Palestinians on final
status issues, including statehood, and we have, according
to the agreement, a period of three years to complete these
agreements. It may take that. It may take less. And this now
becomes from the Labor Party's point of view, and if
elected, the government's point of view after May 29, it
becomes a legitimate option and certainly very encouraging
for the Palestinians.
CHARLIE ROSE: Are you, then, optimistic about the peace
process because of what has happened in the last 24 hours?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: I'm more optimistic. I feel that this,
this peace process is, is bound to succeed, and that it is
irreversible, not because of a romantic belief in peace
process, but because if we look rationally at the, at the
alternatives of what and how Israelis and Palestinians can
live together or coexist as, as neighbors and people who are
intermingled with, with one another, I believe that there is
no other option. I believe that in the Arab world, by and
large, there is a decision, a commitment, a will to
disengage from conflict with Israel, an assessment sense
that there are other priorities for the Arabs. At the same
time, precisely because of this success, other forces, like
Iran and, and its allies are determined to destroy the peace
process. And I-
CHARLIE ROSE: Did-
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: -I am afraid that there will continue to
be a tug of war between these two forces. I also believe
that the forces of peace will prevail.
CHARLIE ROSE: Did the bombing of the refugee camp lose for
Israel some moral force in the conflict in Lebanon?
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: I wouldn't put it in terms of moral. And
it is not a case in which the Arabs are, are angry and
outraged and we bask in our righteousness. I think that the
very fact that in Israel itself there has been soul
searching after this, and that the government and, and
public at one were shocked and dealt with it indicates that
it is not such a contest between the forces of morality on
one hand and the forces of, say, brute force on the other.
But it's much more complex than, than that. I think that we
are on secure moral grounds because we basically want to go
out. I think that there is a fallacy here. It's not a
situation whereby Hizballah and other opposition groups in
Lebanon want to push an Israel out of Lebanon when Israel
wants to be in Lebanon. We want out, and we have offered to
the Lebanese government to negotiate our way out. And
therefore we are not occupiers. We are not a willing power
staying in Lebanon. We are a reluctant power that wants out
of Lebanon in terms that will offer our own people and the
Lebanese people security.
CHARLIE ROSE: But as you know, morality and, and moral
force, like power, is also a question of perception, and
your friend, Yitzhak Rabin, was concerned about that after
Hebron. He was concerned about that after- during the time
of the Intifada.
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: Yes. And it is always difficult to, to
argue for your side when 100 innocent civilians were killed
on the other side. But given the fact that the U.N.
spokesman has verified that Hizballah was using these
innocent civilians as a shield and shelter and that we have
protested that, that the U.N. has protested that, I think
that the moral outrage and the finger that points at the
accused should first and foremost be directed at Hizballah
and its master in Teheran.
CHARLIE ROSE: Ambassador Rabinovich, thank you for joining
us this evening.
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: Thank you very-
CHARLIE ROSE: Pleasure to-
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: -much.
CHARLIE ROSE: -have you on the broadcast.
ITAMAR RABINOVICH: Thank you.
|