|
Back to Ambassadorial Speeches - Ambassador Zalman Shoval
Interview with Ambassador Shoval and Palestinian Delegate
Mamdouh al-Aker on CNN's "Newsmaker Saturday"
Interviewer: Frank Sesno November 2, 1991
FRANK SESNO, Newsmaker Saturday: Did the Madrid Peace Conference bring
Middle East antagonists closer together? Where do they go from here? Can
an ancient conflict give way to a modern peace?
And welcome to a special edition of Newsmaker Saturday. From Madrid, I'm
Frank Sesno. Questions for our guests today, Zalman Shoval, Israel's
ambassador to the U.S. and a delegate to the Mideast Peace Conference.
And, Mamdouh al-Aker, a Palestinian delegate, also in Madrid.
Madrid as turning point. Gentlemen, for the last three days, we've been
hearing the sides talk past one another. I'm wondering what you might
have to say now to one another?
ZALMAN SHOVAL, Israeli Ambassador to the U.S.: Well, I don't think we
really talked past one another. Maybe in the speeches we did. But then
we met from time to time after the speech making, and I think what
really counts is the fact that we are here and that we want to continue.
Dr. MAMDOUH AL-AKER, Palestinian Delegate to Madrid Peace Conference:
Yes, indeed, actually I was quite excited when we met after the --
during the conference, because as I mentioned to you my impression was
when I heard about Mr. Shoval that you had a very negative image about
me, because as I mentioned to you the other day that during my
detention, and in response to the letters you received on my behalf, in
the letters sent by the Israeli embassy, I was described as a hostile
terrorist activist. So I'm very glad now we are sitting together in a
completely different spirit.
SESNO: Just as background, Dr. al-Aker, you were imprisoned for 40 days
earlier this year?
DR. AL-AKER: Yes.
SESNO: For what charges?
DR. AL-AKER: That I was involved in hostile activities, which, and as a
matter of fact --
SESNO: You're from the West Bank?
DR. AL-AKER: Yes, I'm from Nablus and Ramallah, stationed in Ramallah. I
was under solitary confinement for 40 days, and during the
interrogation, and even after that I was not presented with any charge
sheet, and I was not tried. I was released on bail pending my trial, and
then everything was lifted. And I was very pleased that, mentioning this
to Mr. Shoval, that here am I. Do I look to you as a hostile activist?
Terrorist activist?
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, you don't. But you know when you have a country in
the situation where such a lot of terrorism is going on, you have to be
very, very cautious. And sometimes the people who are not directly
concerned are the victims of that. I'm happy to hear that you have not
been a terrorist, and I hope we are on the way to peace.
DR. AL-AKER: I do hope so. But just an example, that sometimes we label
somebody else's activities, and we rush to terrorist and hostility,
while all during that time when I was detained, the only thing I was
involved in is to give guidelines to my people during the gulf war from
a medical perspective.
AMB. SHOVAL: I'm sorry you didn't give better guidelines to your people
in the gulf war not about medical perspectives, because the way most
Palestinians behaved during the gulf war made us as well as most people
in America a bit concerned.
SESNO: Let me ask you both now, the subject at hand that we've been
talking about in Madrid and looking forward to, I suppose you could say,
are these bilateral discussions that are supposed to start. Now, the
Palestinian delegation has said that it will meet with an Israeli
delegation on Sunday, tomorrow. What will you be talking about? In
particular, how are these two sides, are you gentlemen going to resolve
the issue of the location of these talks after this opening session in
Madrid?
DR. AL-AKER: Yes. Although the location is important, but I think we
have one problem. To my surprise, I thought that our Israeli
counterparts are coming with a commitment to the framework of these
negotiations -- and as this framework was put during the, in the
invitation letter and in the letter of assurances, and as well, during
the closing remarks of Secretary Baker on Friday when he summarized the
framework, precisely as a triangle of peace, security and land -- my
disappointment that it seems to me that the Israeli side is not
committed, yes, to this framework. I hope I'm wrong in this.
AMB. SHOVAL: I don't know exactly what framework you refer to, but the
framework, unless we got different texts of invitations, is that we
should start bilateral talks immediately and multilateral talks two
weeks from now.
DR. AL-AKER: It's precisely so.
AMB. SHOVAL: And I think we are going to meet, hopefully, tomorrow, on
Sunday, with you, the Jordanians -- I don't know about the Syrians, but
that's a problem you and they will have to solve -- to start discussing
interim arrangements for the next five years with regard to Judea,
Samaria and Gaza, what you call the West Bank, and I think that is the
framework.
DR. AL-AKER: Yes, actually, this is where we differ. Interim
arrangements, it is not happening in a vacuum. It is happening within a
framework to reach peace, to have territorial solution, and to have
security. Because for you, maybe, the interim arrangement will lead to
autonomy. To me, and to the understanding, the way we understand it, and
the way it was put, as I said, by Secretary Baker on Friday in the
closing remarks to the conference that all the negotiations has to be
kept within this framework. We want to reach peace, which has to be
built on justice and international legitimacy, but at the same time, two
important aspects, the rest of the triangle, is the security and land.
So I want to see the interim arrangements leading to my control over my
occupied land, and at the same time I'm willing and quite ready to see
and to satisfy reasonably the security needs of Israel.
SESNO: These are the things that you gentlemen, your sides are going to
negotiate over, whether we're talking about an interim arrangement,
self-government, autonomy, call it what you will, the talks have to
begin. The question of venue, of location is still a problem, though, as
I understand it. The Israelis have proposed holding these talks, very
much want to hold these talks in the region, in Israel, or in a West
Bank town. How do you feel about that?
DR. AL-AKER: Actually to me it's quite odd to have negotiations, being
occupied, to negotiate with your occupier, with this situation as if the
negotiations will be under duress. We have, we are living under the
situation, the conditions of occupation. We have curfews. We are -- our
telephones are tapped. I'm sure offices are bugged.
AMB. SHOVAL: We can have these negotiations in any Arab country. I hope
they won't tap your telephones there. They won't have curfew. Why should
we talk about peace between us and you and the other Arab states far
away from the region. We live in that region. Let's sit down there and
discuss peace. There's no problem about that.
DR. AL-AKER: Yes, but the way we understand bilateral talks, that at one
time it will be held in an Arab territory, the other time in an Israeli
territory.
AMB. SHOVAL: Right.
DR. AL-AKER: Especially now taking into consideration the Palestinian
delegation being under occupation, with the conditions we are having, I
think it is quite impossible with this imbalance and asymmetry between
our conditions. So it is, to my mind, it is only natural and logical to
have the negotiations, at least to start with, until a certain stage, on
a neutral ground. This is the way the, in Vietnam, for example, when the
negotiations about Vietnam, it was carried on in Paris. Recently the
Cambodian problem, it was negotiated in Paris.
AMB. SHOVAL: For different reasons. You have many friendly Arab
countries surrounding us. We can have them there. We can have them on
the border. That shouldn't be a problem. But we have to go back and
forth to our governments, and we have to make decisions, and I would say
it's an expression of the spirit of peace and of living together in the
area if we have these talks in the area.
SESNO: Ambassador Shoval, are you saying that you'd be willing to have
these talks, Israel would be willing to have these talks only in an Arab
country, permanently set, say, in Cairo?
AMB. SHOVAL: No. No, we want to change between Israel and the Arab
countries, but if our Palestinian colleagues have a problem like Mr. al-
Aker just said, I don't think it's a terrible problem. We can have the
talks with you, for instance, in an Arab country.
SESNO: Secretary of State Baker said if these sides deadlock over the
simple location of the talks the world will not understand. Are you
going to be able on one day, on Sunday, in Madrid, to solve this issue,
to find a compromise location? Or is this going to break down?
AMB. SHOVAL: It's not going to break down, because I believe, I hope
that our Arab friends from the territories, and the Arab states --
certainly Jordan; I don't know about Syria -- have a stake in arriving
at peace.
SESNO: So does Israel.
AMB. SHOVAL: And certainly Israel is always said that.
SESNO: Breakdown or compromise?
DR. AL-AKER: Yes, actually, we have made a lot of difficult and even
painful discussions to come to Madrid. And again, why to leave Madrid?
Now we have this atmosphere, and a peaceful conference, and Madrid,
especially to us, with our Jewish and Arab histories, it means a lot. So
why to move from that country.
AMB. SHOVAL: It means some good things. It means some bad things.
SESNO: We're not going to solve it --
AMB. SHOVAL: This is not the problem today.
DR. AL-AKER: For both our histories there is something positive and
something negative.
SESNO: We're not going to solve this now. We've got to take a break.
We'll come back. Please stay with us.
[Commercial break]
SESNO: And welcome back to this special edition of Newsmaker Saturday
from Madrid. Our guests today, Mamdouh al-Aker, who joins us now, a
delegate from the Palestinian-Jordanian delegation to this peace
conference, and Zalman Shoval, the U.S. ambassador from Israel -- or
Israel's ambassador to the U.S., also a delegate here.
I'd like to ask you both, at this conference, as it convened, Secretary
of State Baker, clearly frustrated that there hadn't been a little bit
more spirit of compromise, perhaps, more progress toward these bilateral
discussions which we've just been batting around here, called on both
sides to engage in confidence building measures, and to do them now.
What would each of you like the other to do?
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, if the question is directed to me --
SESNO: It's directed to both of you.
AMB. SHOVAL: I would like the Palestinians to stop terrorism, to stop
violence against us, and against themselves. As far as we are concerned,
we are offering them -- and we have offered for the last 13 years --
self-government to take care of their own affairs. We want them to run
their own affairs.
DR. AL-AKER: Under occupation. To run our affairs under occupation.
AMB. SHOVAL: That is right. Because we want you to run all your daily
affairs except those which concern our security. But that's a lot more
than you ever had before. Admit it to me. You didn't have it from the
Jordanians, certainly didn't have it from the British before, the Turks.
Let's take one step. You have always rejected our proposals in the past.
The Palestinian residents in the territories were the main victims of
extremism, of the PLO, of the Arab states who told you, hold out, don't
take compromise. I think you have changed your mind, now, but let's go
ahead with it.
DR. AL-AKER: Look at it, now. You are referring to us as the Arab
residents in the territories. I think the first, the very important
first step is to treat me as equal. I'm a people. And this is the cry of
our people, that we are people. We are not just residents or inhabitants
of Judea and Samaria. We are the Palestinian people. This is one thing.
The moment you recognize me as equal, I think the whole atmosphere will
be different.
SESNO: Ambassador Shoval, do you recognize them as equal? Do you
recognize them as a people?
AMB. SHOVAL: Look, let's leave history aside.
DR. AL-AKER: This is not history. We've had -- I am a people.
AMB. SHOVAL: No, no, no. Let me speak out. I say let's leave history
aside, but I recognize that there is today a group of Arabs in Palestine
who used to be in Palestine who consider themselves a separate people.
That's all right. Otherwise we wouldn't be sitting here. I have no
problem with that.
DR. AL-AKER: I recognize you as a people.
AMB. SHOVAL: Yes. I have no problem with that.
DR. AL-AKER: The Israeli people. I'm ready to --
AMB. SHOVAL: I have no problem with that. Otherwise we wouldn't
negotiate with you.
SESNO: And to be fair, Dr. al-Aker, do you recognize them in addition to
being as a people, as a country?
DR. AL-AKER: As a people --
SESNO: As a nation?
DR. AL-AKER: Yes, as a nation, and a state. And this is the spirit, now,
we have come to this conference, and not only in this conference, but in
the Palestinian National Council in 1988, we have said that we are ready
to compromise, and to have the two state solution.
AMB. SHOVAL: But, Mr. Arafat the next day in Paris said kaduk (ph.). And
he said what we promised in Algiers to compromise, this is not up to me.
We'll have to decide it.
DR. AL-AKER: Let us back to the confidence building measure. I think the
very important step is to recognize each other, to treat each other with
the principles of mutuality and reciprocity. Now, I'm now coming to this
conference with open heart, open mind, and trying to reach out to the
other, and saying here we are. Let us treat each other as peoples
entitled to the same right. I'm not ready to deny you any right which I
ask for myself, and you should not deny me any right you wanted for
yourself. You have the right for self-determination. We have the right
for self-determination.
SESNO: Let me ask you this, I've ask you both to pose to the other what
you'd like to see as confidence building measures. What would you each
offer the other as a confidence building measure? What will you offer
the Israelis?
DR. AL-AKER: Exactly. I think each side should address the main concern
of the other side. To me, I believe genuinely that after having been
engaged in a lot of dialogues with Israelis, that the main concern is
security. So, I want -- I have, my obligation is to address the question
of security in a reasonable way.
SESNO: Suspend the Intifada?
DR. AL-AKER: Intifada actually, what is intifada? Intifada is a focus at
this occupation.
AMB. SHOVAL: But it's bloodshed. It's bloodshed of Palestinians, and
it's bloodshed of Israelis.
SESNO: Gentlemen, we're going to take a break. We'll pick this
conversation up in just a moment. Keep your thoughts. Stay with us.
[Commercial break]
SESNO: Dr. al-Aker, back to you, what specifically then is the
confidence building step that Palestinians would offer Israelis?
DR. AL-AKER: For us, actually, coming to this conference, and accepting
all the preconditions and the constraints is something. And --
AMB. SHOVAL: You're doing it for us?
DR. AL-AKER: For both of us. For both of us. And one gesture, actually,
our people, in spite of the painful conditions of the occupation, they
were able to hand the Israeli soldiers with olive branches. This is by
itself is a gesture.
SESNO: Dr. Shoval, what would you offer?
AMB. SHOVAL: On the same day of the olive branches a mother of seven was
killed by Palestinians, bus driver, father of five was killed. But let's
leave this aside. I know you were not concerned with that. But this
explains our concern --
SESNO: All right, ambassador, what will you offer the Palestinians.
AMB. SHOVAL: We offer them -- we offer you from the very beginning even,
without negotiating, run your own affairs.
DR. AL-AKER: Under occupation. Run your own affairs under occupation.
AMB. SHOVAL: Yes, okay. Because what are we talking about? What's this
whole process about? This is disputed land. You say it's your land. We
say we have a right to it too. The whole process is --
DR. AL-AKER: What we say, let us share it. Let us share it.
AMB. SHOVAL: All right.
DR. AL-AKER: What we say, just we want to hear it from you, we are ready
--
AMB. SHOVAL: All right. That's what we say. We say Jews and Palestinian
Arabs will have to live together.
DR. AL-AKER: As equals.
AMB. SHOVAL: As equals, please.
DR. AL-AKER: Having the same rights. The right for self-determination,
the right for statehood, the right for retain -- yes, equals.
AMB. SHOVAL: Yes, but, when you say the right for statehood, that means
that we will be excluded from these areas.
DR. AL-AKER: No. No.
AMB. SHOVAL: We will have to find a formula --
DR. AL-AKER: This is a commitment --
AMB. SHOVAL: Where we have to share a land which is dear to both of us.
We are ready to it. We are ready. We have been ready for it --
DR. AL-AKER: You have your state, we have our state, as neighbors.
SESNO: Mr. Ambassador, gentlemen, this debate is illustrative, but I
want to jump in here. We're almost out of time. What did these three
days in Madrid accomplish?
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, they accomplished our sitting together here in CNN,
which is important. And I think that's a symbol --
SESNO: But CNN isn't going to solve this problem.
AMB. SHOVAL: Who knows? Who knows? But this is a symbol of us wanting to
sit together, because we will have to live together forever in a country
which is common to both of us. And, you know, in Madrid, in Spain was
the last time Jews and Arabs lived in peace together. Maybe it's a good
omen.
SESNO: Dr. al-Aker, what did this accomplish?
DR. AL-AKER: I think -- I agree with Mr. Shoval, that the mere sitting
together is something, but I think to get really to business, we need to
go to the main issues. Just I want to hear it from our Israeli
counterparts that we are ready to end the Israeli occupation and to
withdraw. We are ready. Just to say we are ready. Say we are ready to
recognize you as people, entitled for all the rights.
SESNO: Mamdouh al-Aker, I appreciate your time. Zalman Shoval, an
illustrative debate, indeed. And as Secretary of State Baker said, one
must crawl before one walks. The crawling is very slow.
I'm Frank Sesno in Madrid. Thanks for joining us on Newsmaker Saturday.
|