August 26, 2003
Israel's ambassador defends security fence
Published in the Washington Times.
By His Excellency Daniel Ayalon
What would the U.S. government do if suicide bombers were constantly
entering this country and blowing themselves up on public buses,
at local restaurants and in community parks, murdering hundreds
of Americans?
For Israelis, this isn't a hypothetical question. Over the past
3 years, the Israeli public has been forced to deal with an ongoing
and deliberate campaign of terrorism in which all Israelis Jews
and Arabs, young and old, men, women and children are considered
legitimate targets by the Palestinian suicide bombers. This sad
reality was demonstrated again last Tuesday in the horrific attack
on an Israeli bus in Jerusalem.
Constructing a security fence, thereby creating a physical barrier
between Israel and the terrorists in the West Bank, is one of
many defensive measures adopted by the government of Israel in
order to combat the infiltration of suicide bombers into Israeli
cities. The concept is both simple and tested. Despite the fact
that Gaza is the center for both Hamas and Islamic Jihad the two
terrorist organizations most active in carrying out suicide attacks
against Israelis there have been practically no successful infiltrations
of suicide bombers from this region into the Israeli heartland.
The reason for this is that a security fence separates Gaza from
Israel. This security fence acts as a shield, preventing access
for terrorists. As the reality on the ground has proved in Gaza,
by transferring this security measure to the West Bank it will
be possible to substantially reduce the number of terrorist infiltrations
into Israel.
The security fence is partially complete and is already producing
positive results. In those parts of Israel now protected by the
fence, we have experienced a dramatic reduction in terrorist infiltrations.
The city of Hadera is a key example. Situated in the heart of
Israel, Hadera and its surroundings have suffered a significant
series of murderous suicide bombings coming from the West Bank
against public transportation centers and shopping malls, resulting
in horrific casualties. But since the construction began on the
northern sector of the security fence, which shields the region
of Hadera, there has been a substantial period of tranquility.
This same improvement is true for other Israeli cities and communities
now safeguarded by the fence. Can anyone seriously argue against
the position that the security fence is making Israeli citizens
safer?
The security fence will not only save lives, but it can save
the political process. Today, terrorist groups have the ability
to hold that process hostage because of their capability to conduct
these devastating acts. The creation of this security fence, coupled
with decisive action by the Palestinian leadership to dismantle
the terrorist organizations, will neutralize this ongoing threat
to the peace process.
Some have called this security fence a wall. This is true in
only two small areas of the security fence where concrete is used
in order to prevent sniper fire into Israel. The security fence
is primarily comprised of wire and electronic devices used for
surveillance purposes, similar to that which Israel has on its
border with Lebanon, which has also proved to be an effective
measure against incoming attacks on Israel.
While any inconvenience to the local population, such as a farmer
having to take an alternate route to his field, is clearly problematic
to those individuals involved, it must be put into perspective.
In no way can an equal comparison be drawn between these inconveniences
and the many lives that will be saved as a direct result of this
project.
Israel is working closely with the United States in order to
minimize any negative impact that construction may cause on the
Palestinian population in the designated areas. However, preventing
these terrorist atrocities that have become all too frequent over
the years must be the dominant factor in any consideration of
public policy.
Surely, if suicide bombers were constantly entering the United
States, the American public would demand that its leadership take
every necessary measure to protect their lives. Why should Israelis
expect any different from their leaders?