October 25, 2001
Ways of Coping with Terror Remarks by DM Binyamin Ben Eliezer
When we talk about terror, which to our misfortune has been
accompanying Israel since its establishment, it would be wise
to begin by defining the concept terror.
Terror is a kind of limited struggle in which violence is used
against civilians as a mode of action in order to achieve
political objectives.
In the case of Islamic terror, the definition may be expanded
by adding religious objectives.
In order not to remain on a theoretical level only, I would like
to analyze the conflict in which Israel has been involved since
its establishment, in which terror is used against the citizens
of the State of Israel, while focusing on the armed conflict
against the Palestinians over the past year.
Terror is not only Israel's problem, it is exploited against
countries worldwide, as we have recently witnessed. Even a
great superpower is not protected from terror.
Terror has several main features:
a. Hitting the country's "soft spot" - striking at its citizens. It
receives broad media coverage, sometimes even on a global
level (such as in the case of the terror in the United States).
b. Undermining citizens' sense of security.
c. Hitting civilians without distinction (as opposed to guerilla
warfare in which there are military and establishment-related
objectives).
d. Terror does not take rules and international conventions
into account, nor does it obey any law, including moral and
international laws. Terror is not governed by any form of
state or global law and order.
e. Terror uses any possible weapon, including the use of
civilian technological platforms as the basis for weaponry and
ammunition. For example, in the case of the Twin Towers,
Bin-Laden converted the plane into a weapon and the fuel into
ammunition, thus multiplying the force of the destruction, the
killing and its intensity.
f. The type of terror that is selected is one which, in the
opinion of those executing it, promotes the political
objectives in the best and quickest way.
g. Using advanced technologies in the civilian domain and
converting them into a terror component.
The components of the threat of international terror:
a. Terror is used by organizations to achieve national
objectives in various countries throughout the world.
Worldwide Islamic terror aims at harming Jews anywhere in
the world - embassies, synagogues, etc.
b. Internal terror, within the country, is used mainly in civil
wars when a group within the country wishes to achieve
political results through terror (for example - Ireland).
c. Inter-state terror, in which one country uses terror (and not
guerilla warfare or full-scale war) against another country,
usually characterizes weak countries that cannot defeat a
rival country in a conventional struggle.
Components of terror in the State of Israel
Who implements terror?
a. The Palestinian Authority, which claims the right to its own
country, on its own terms, within the State of Israel and uses
direct or indirect terror to achieve this end through other
terror organizations over which it has no control, or has no
desire to control.
b. Terror organizations that stand for the liberation of
Palestine which are based upon radical Muslim religious
movements (Hamas, Islamic Jihad).
c. National liberation movements that are nationally rather
than religiously based (such as the Popular Front for the
Liberation of Palestine, responsibile for the assassination of
Tourism Minister Ze'evy.)
Ways of activating terror:
a. Suicide bombers in densely populated centers as the
number one component.
b. Car bombs in densely populated centers, converting cars
into a bomb which serves as both weapon and ammunition,
particularly within the Green Line.
c. Shooting attacks against civilians on the roads (in Judea and
Samaria region and in the Gaza Strip area, but recently, also
within the Green Line).
d. Shooting at settlements (with small arms or mortars) with
the objective of hitting civilians and property within the
settlement.
The objective of all forms of terror is the attack against a
maximum number of civilians anywhere, with no geographical
distinction or differentiation between the type of civilians.
Recently, in the Gaza Strip, we have seen entry into
settlements as well (Elei Sinai) and an attack on civilians
within the settlement without distinction.
Ways of coping with terror:
a. Having a full supply of patience and forbearance - personal
and social strength, because without this component there is
no way of coping with terror over time.
b. Good and focused intelligence and sophisticated methods in
creative implementation to seek and acquire intelligence
(while using advanced technological means).
c. Self-protection - seeking out terrorists everywhere and
attempting to strike at them prior to the execution of a
terror attack.
d. Preventing the exit of terrorists from high-risk cities by
imposing internal and external closures. I wish to clarify that
our forces that have surrounded some Palestinian cities are
only taking security measured as arresting terrorists and
preventing the export of terror attacks from these cities. Our
only goal is to act in self-defense; we have no wish to stay
there, to occupy these territories or to destroy the
Palestinian Authority. Our only intention is to prevent terror
attacks and make the Palestinians begin acting against terror.
e. Setting obstacles to prevent the departure of terrorists
(mainly a fence, such as the fence around the Gaza Strip).
f. Punishments - hitting the headquarters and other centers in
order to punish those who establish terrorist policy and those
who send the terrorists.
g. Separating between the war against terror (hitting the
terrorists and those who sent them) while creating a relief
program for innocent civilians.
h. Attempt to reach an understanding at the negotiating table,
to put an end to terror (unfortunately, we do not see any
partner for this purpose, at the moment).
What is our greatest disadvantage in handling terror?
The best way to fight terror is to use terror itself. The State
of Israel, which has selected a path based on values and
ethics, cannot allow itself to kill innocent civilians, women and
children. We cannot pay Palestinian terror back with its own
weapon.
The security-economic link:
I would like to point out that contrary to the false impression
that may have been formed - Israel is a very stable country
from a security, economic, political and social point of view.
We have been living since our establishment under the threat
of terror and this has not stopped us from building one of the
most advanced and sophisticated economies in the world.
Israel has accomplished great achievements in the industrial
field, particularly in advanced hi-tech industries.
We will continue this trend in the future as well.
Unfortunately, we have witnessed how terror can hit any place
in the world which promotes Western values.
The Defense establishment, for its part, shall continue to act
to provide maximum security and stability in order to allow
Israeli society to continue prospering as it has since the
establishment of the State of Israel.
Our policy is to fight an uncompromising war against terror.
We shall continue to strive to return to the negotiating table.
We are committed to the Tenet and Mitchell Plans and to the
quest for a political solution to the armed conflict with the
Palestinians. |
|