Ambassador Ben-Elissar's Response to the New York Times' Har Homa Editorial Wednesday, March 5, 1997

                     AMBASSADOR BEN-ELISSAR'S RESPONSE TO
                    THE NEW YORK TIMES' HAR HOMA EDITORIAL 
                           Wednesday, March 5, 1997


To the Editor:

You are correct in saying that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's 
authorization of the Har Homa housing project in Jerusalem does nothing to 
justify threats hurled by some Palestinian leaders at Israel and the peace 
process (editorial, Feb. 27). The threat of riots is in no way compatible with 
the negotiations under way to promote peace.

Har Homa has never been inhabited or cultivated and utilizes expropriated land 
originally owned mostly by Jews (76 percent). Timing has always been a 
sensitive issue when considering Jerusalem. Yet as long as the right for 
Jerusalem to grow naturally is held in dispute, any building done on its land 
will be contested. Refraining from new construction in Jerusalem, which you 
advise, is tantamount to succumbing to blackmail.

Failing to continue building Jerusalem's infrastructure will be perceived as a 
political statement by default. The natural growth of Jerusalem cannot come to 
a standstill because of Palestinian opposition to Israel's sovereignty over 
the city.

The new housing endeavor, calling for some 6,000 apartments for Jews in Har 
Homa and 3,000 apartments for Arabs, will provide needed living space for the 
inhabitants of Israel's primary urban center.

A response to the political challenges voiced by critics of these projects 
must also be made. In this respect, Prime Minister Netanyahu's actions 
represent the consensus of the Jewish people who, in 3,000 years, have held 
only Jerusalem as their religious, emotional and political capital. Jerusalem 
will forever remain the heart of Israel and the Jewish people, as well as 
Israel's eternal capital.

ELIAHU BEN-ELISSAR
Ambassador of Israel to the United States

Return to Ambassador Ben-Elissar's Speeches Page