![]() |
"The Road to a Secure Peace" by
Ambassador Ben-Elissar September 29, 1996 |
THE ROAD TO A SECURE PEACE
By Ambassador Eliahu Ben-Elissar
("The New York Times," Op-Ed, September 29, 1996)
This week was to have been a time of joy and festivities for Israelis. Many
pilgrims will visit Jerusalem, our capital, in the same way that our
ancestors did for millenniums. But this year there was to be something
special: an ancient aqueduct, today a tunnel, built by the Hasmonean Kings
and rediscovered by archeologists some 150 years ago, was recently opened
along the Temple Mount. This tunnel was intended not only to connect Jews
with their glorious past but to allow four times as many international
visitors to visit the area, bringing a much-needed influx of revenue to
merchants in the old city's Muslim and Christian sectors. But instead of
festivities, a series of tragic confrontations swept Israel and the
Palestinian autonomous areas.
It is difficult to fathom the connection between the opening of an
archeological site and the loss of so many lives this week. The tunnel is
only several hundred yards long and does not pass beneath the Temple Mount;
nor does it pass beneath the foundations of any mosque. In fact, it runs
adjacent to the Western Wall, Judaism's holiest shrine and the only
continuous remnant of ancient Jewish sovereignty. No private property was
confiscated or expropriated to open the tunnel, and to avoid any public
commotion it was not opened in the regular business hours. In short, the
municipality of Jerusalem acted within its rights and its obligations to
promote commerce and tourism. Those who object to the opening of this
archeological site in fact challenge the right of the State of Israel and
municipality of Jerusalem to perform their most basic duties to their
citizens, a right which other countries take for granted.
The real reasons for the outbreak of violence last week lie not in an
archeological tunnel, but in the depths of a modern political pit. Israel
and her Arab neighbors have been negotiating peace for a number of years.
The new Israeli Government has repeatedly emphasized its commitment to
honor agreements signed by previous governments, including accords with the
Palestinians.
Since the new Government took office some 100 days ago, it has maintained a
very active outreach, on all levels, with the Palestinian Authority. It
would appear, however, that some of our partners in the peace process look
upon the change of government as an opportunity to exert pressure on and
extract concessions from Israel for political gain at the negotiating
table.
This is evident by negative characterizations of Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu in the Arab press and by Arab officials, by the movement of
troops along our northern borders and the continued terrorist attacks from
Lebanon. These tactics will neither bring about Israeli submission in the
negotiations nor will they dissuade us from our deep commitment to
continuing the peace
process.
Today Jewish and Arab families are in mourning for the many lives, Arab and
Jewish, that have been lost. The orchestrated campaign of demonstrations
triggered a potentially dangerous threat to the cause of peace. As called
for in the Interim Agreement, Israel and the Palestinians have jointly
undertaken to maintain law and order, provide security and negotiate in
good faith.
Negotiating in good faith means that both parties have vowed to forsake
violence in favor of dialogue. It also means that both parties have agreed
to relinquish the threat of violence even when they fail to achieve all of
their goals in the talks. Hence, Yasser Arafat's threats to release the
jinn of violence from the bottle whenever the negotiating process becomes
too frustrating for him are unacceptable. Likewise, the use of Israeli-
approved weapons against Israeli soldiers is intolerable. Palestinian
policemen were admitted into the territories to maintain law and order and
provide security, not to participate in violent demonstrations.
Mr. Arafat may indeed be in a difficult position, but it is up to him, and
him alone, to choose the path for the Palestinian people. The road of
violence and bloodshed will lead nowhere and it will endanger all that has
already been achieved. The road to peace may be steep and at times
frustrating and weary, but it is a journey that all of us in the Mideast
embarked on in Madrid five years ago. Israel has already chosen the road to
a secure peace. The Palestinian Authority is likewise bound to choose
stability, dialogue and peace.